cesarean debate (now caesareanbirth.org)

The informed decision to choose a planned cesarean with no medical or obstetrical indication is perfectly legitimate

  • Home
  • All Posts By Date
  • HEALTH DISCLAIMER
  • Key Message
  • ELECTIVECESAREAN.COM
  • About me - Pauline Hull

All Posts By Date


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Choosing Cesarean: A Natural Birth Plan

Choosing Cesarean: A Natural Birth Plan
New Book Available Now
BritMums - Leading the Conversation

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
All Comments
Atom
All Comments

Useful links

  • * electivecesarean.com
  • * YOUTUBE Cesareans channel
  • * online petition: "Prophylactic cesarean delivery is a legitimate birth choice"
  • * blog archive Jan-Sep 2008

LOOK INSIDE BOOK!!

LOOK INSIDE BOOK!!
New video highlights CHAPTERS

News and Interviews

CLICK HERE for my TV, Radio, Film and other media interviews

NEW VIDEO

NEW VIDEO

Popular Posts

  • Driving after a c-section - how long did you wait?
    Did you wait 6 weeks? 3 weeks? What were you advised to do? It seems that there is some confusion about when you should start driving agai...
  • Complaint to BBC's The One Show re: its Cesarean Coverage
    Last night, I contacted BBC Complaints, and also the programme itself, to ask why 'news' of NHS Trusts banning maternal request cesa...
  • Bupa refusing to pay for life-saving emergency c-sections?
    In a letter titled " Caesarian conflict ", published in The Scotsman yesterday, Dr John Cameron claims that Bupa will only pay fo...
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Surgery for young mum on Channel 4 show
    This week's episode of C4's Embarrassing Bodies illustrates the reality of pelvic organ prolapse following vaginal birth with the f...
  • Breech Birth Choice or Pressure?
    Many women have complained that when they wanted to try to deliver their breech babies vaginally (e.g. using ECV), they have been pressured ...
  • Two Australian babies might have lived if delivered by cesarean
    Writing for Adelaide Now , Ken McGregor reports on an ongoing inquest into the deaths of two babies - both delivered by ventouse - in 2006 a...
  • 20 years after birth: Incontinence 3 X more common with vaginal delivery
    This is the conclusion of new research from the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. You can read the full release...
  • Study advises against non-medical cesareans but how accurate is the advice?
    I am utterly perplexed by the conclusions drawn in this latest report from the World Health Organization, ' Method of delivery and preg...
  • Severe vaginal tears common during birth in Utah
    An article by Heather May in The Salt Lake Tribune on January 7th reports on a study in which "almost 4,000 Utah women suffered severe...
  • Another c-section refused, another baby dies
    Lynn News reported the loss of Zoe and Robert Rust's son Lincoln, stillborn on July 22, 2010, and the fact that managers at Queen Eliz...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2016 (10)
    • ▼  November (3)
      • Written Evidence Submitted to UK Parliament Scienc...
      • Planned Birth Research that Does Not Compare Plann...
      • Planned Birth Research that Does Not Compare Plann...
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (3)
  • ►  2014 (1)
    • ►  November (1)
  • ►  2013 (31)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (107)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2011 (71)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (6)
  • ►  2010 (60)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2009 (79)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2008 (30)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (13)
View Pauline McDonagh Hull's profile on LinkedIn
Powered By Blogger

cesarean debate

Loading...

DISCLAIMER

This website does not claim to be a source of medical, legal or professional advice, and takes no responsibility for the advice and views referred to in articles, research, websites, references and external site content. The use of information from cesareandebate.blogspot.com is at your own risk and we accept no liability for errors or inaccuracies. The views and comments provided by the author of this website are personal and do not claim to be a professional source of medical information or advice. Visitors to this site should seek specific advice from their own physician or other health care professional before taking any individual action or decisions. cesareandebate.blogspot.com assumes no liability, obligation or responsibility for any part of correspondence, purchase or promotion via third party advertisement placements on this website.

MAIN WEBSITE

http://www.electivecesarean.com
Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.